Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 483, 2021 10 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34620082

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early recurrences of atrial arrhythmias (ERAA) after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation do not predict procedural failure. A well-demarcated homogeneous lesion delivered by cryoballoon is less arrhythmogenic, and the recommended three-months blanking period may not refer to cryoballoon ablation (CBA). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the predictive role of ERAA after second-generation CBA using an implantable loop recorder. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled 100 patients (58 males, median age 58) with paroxysmal/persistent AF undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) CBA using second-generation cryoballoon with simultaneous ECG loop recorder implantation. The duration of follow-up was 12 months, with scheduled visits at 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: 99 patients from 100 completed the 12-month follow-up period. ERAA occurred in 31.3 % of patients. 83.9 % of patients with ERAA also developed late recurrences. The 12-month freedom from AF in patients with ERAA was significantly lower than in those without ERAA (p < 0.0001). Non-paroxysmal AF and longer arrhythmia history were associated with increased risk of both early (HR 3.27; 95 % CI 1.32-8.08; p = 0.010 and HR 1.0147; 95 % CI 1.008-1.086; p = 0.015, respectively) and late recurrences (HR 3.89; 95 % CI 1.67-9.04; p = 0.002 and HR 1.0142; 95 % CI 1.007-1.078; p = 0.019, respectively) of AF. ERAA were another predictor for procedural failure (HR 15.2; 95 % CI (6.42-35.99; p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: ERAA occurred in the third of the patients after PV second-generation CBA and are strongly associated with procedural failure. Longer duration of AF history and persistent AF are independent predictors of AF's early and late recurrence.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Criocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Veias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto , Potenciais de Ação , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial/instrumentação , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Veias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Recidiva , Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto/instrumentação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2020: 2352648, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33224976

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This multicenter, prospective registry evaluated the comparative safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using the Watchman device (WD) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in real-world clinical practice in Russia. METHODS: The study included data from 200 consecutive NVAF patients (66.8 ± 7.8 years, 44.5% female, median CHA2DS2VASc 4, median HAS-BLED 3) who had undergone LAAO implantation using WD (n = 108) or ACP (n = 92) from September 2015 to December 2017 in 5 medical centers in Russia. The primary safety endpoint was the procedure-related major adverse events, and the primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of thromboembolic events, device thrombosis, hemorrhagic events, and unexplained death during the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Successful LAAO was performed in all 92 (100%) patients with ACP and 105 (97.2%) with WD (p = 0.053). At 12 months, primary safety endpoint occurred in 6.5% of patients in the ACP group with no events in the WD group (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.008). During the 12-month follow-up, the primary efficacy endpoint has occurred in 8.3% of patients in the WD group (n = 9) and 1.1% of patients in the ACP group (n = 1) (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter prospective registry, LAA closure with the WD was associated with significantly higher thromboembolic events rate in NVAF patients. Patients, receiving the ACP, had more procedure-related major adverse events. However, further multicenter studies are necessary to evaluate these findings.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Apêndice Atrial/cirurgia , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 4(3): 1-6, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32617466

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) of epicardial accessory pathways (APs) can be performed via the coronary sinus (CS) system. Variable CS anatomy with complications of former CA procedures inside the CS venous system may require using alternative CA approach and technology. CASE SUMMARY: We report the case of a 23-year-old man with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and history of aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) and unsuccessful previous AP radiofrequency ablation (RFA). CS venography during the redo procedure revealed an early CS trifurcation with cardiac veins stenosis, thus with difficulties in maintaining cardiac veins' access and catheter manoeuvring inside CS venous system. The last office visit with electrocardiogram (ECG) performance was in 3 months after the CA. Neither delta wave on the ECG nor any complaints/adverse health effects was detected at that time. DISCUSSION: Successful CA of epicardial AP in patients with a high risk of SCD is essential. However, CS complex anatomy and changes after former RFA inside it may lead to CS venous system access limitations. Alternative CA approach and technology should be considered to ensure CS venous system cannulation and epicardial AP CA performance.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...